The Computer as Logic Prosthesis |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fluency in symbolic and abstract thought enables us to engage in
very complex behaviors at a practical and imaginary level, something
that we've always done in relation to the currently in vogue models of
how things work. The computer is a electronic Logical Manipulator that
uses the model of the algorithm developed by Bertrand Russell |
Bertrand
Russell; (1872-1970) English Analytical Philosopher
and radical. ![]() Alan Turing (1912-54) English Mathematician and
pioneer computer scientist. |
What's important here is that the computer is an algorithmic ![]() |
Algorithm: "A series of instructions or procedural steps for the solution of a specific problem." (as opposed to a heuristic approach, or trial and error) |
Concatenations.
The computer can act initially like another machine, a ledger book say, but can then concatenate these functions (ledger book + calculator = spreadsheet) and then it can represent information in a way that helps in our symbolic manipulations (spreadsheet + drawing = graph). In this way the computer lets us use more sophisticated words to describe what is happening; from I run, to I represent, now we can add abstract (neural) words like `I summarise', `I extrapolate', `I pattern'. |
|
Concatenation plus Speed
It is this ability of the computer to take over calculation and speed
it up immensely and display the results as patterns, that has given rise
to our understanding of chaos theory and change the technical/culture
model by which things are done. It's not the sophistication of the
logic that has allowed us to begin to understand complex systems, but
the speed which we can get through vast numbers of calculations. |
The Mandelbrot set is a very simple equation: |
The Information Prosthesis.
The ability to assemble of large amounts of data onto a screen, and the ability manipulate, colour and dimensionalise this information, makes the computer a kind of mathematically accurate imaginative space. The use of the computer as a information prosthetic, to translate between sets of data and abstractions is, it's prime exploitable ability - whether it's used for useful or destructive ends is still a `user function'. |
![]() - let me give you prosthetic! |
Well, fine, but how
does it relate to self? What about this technical/cultural model of `how things work' then? Some more about chaos... More on information's relationship with mathematics... |
|